![]() ![]() ![]() 16 bit allows indices up to 65,536 so, if 65,536 is the limit in the number of columns, it is likely to be a historical 16 bit limit unless both row number and column number are contained in the same index number.Įdit: Column number seems to be a memory management problem, where even tiny sheets need to use much more memory if the column number is increased. That being said, I somehow doubt that 60,000 columns is a 32/64 bit limit as 32 bit allows indices up to 4,294,967,296. How many users want 60k+ columns in a spreadsheet compared with how many users don't? ![]() This has been the case for well over 10 years, so this whole attitude of, oh well we really don't need 64 bit why bother is just becoming a very negative excuse.įeature enhancement is about getting the maximum benefit for the maximum number of users with the available, always limited, resource. Coldwash wrote:Ever try using Calc for more than ~60k Columns?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |